This racially-charged mystery, 1968’s Oscar winner for Best Picture, has aged gracefully over the years. The secret to its success can be attributed to its many layers. Peel back the mystery plot and you have a potent examination of racial tension in the South in the 1960s. Peel that back and you have a rich character study of two lonely police detectives, from completely different backgrounds, who gradually earn each other’s respect.
The film opens with a nighttime “tour” of Sparta, Mississippi, as police officer Sam Woods (Warren Oates) makes his rounds in his patrol car. He stops at a diner for a cold Coca Cola, then drives past closed shops with their bright neon signs. He pauses at a house where a young exhibitionist walks around in the nude. It’s a typical night in the sleepy little town…until Sam finds a dead body in an alley way.
The murder victim turns out to be an industrialist who planned to build a big factory in Sparta. The local police chief, Bill Gillespie (Rod Steiger), quickly launches an investigation that results in the arrest of a well-dressed black man at the train station. Much to Gillespie’s dismay, he learns his prime suspect is actually a police detective from Philadelphia named Virgil Tibbs (Sidney Poitier), who was awaiting a connecting train to Memphis. Tibb’s Philly superior tells Gillespie that Virgil is his “number one homicide expert.”
Though Gillespie doesn’t like Tibbs, he realizes that he needs help. Gillespie knows his subordinates are ineffective (they can’t even remember to oil the air conditioner) and the mayor won’t support him if he fails to find the killer quickly. Most importantly, Gillespie realizes that he’s out of his element; he just wants to run a “nice clean town” and lacks the expertise to handle a homicide investigation. For his part, Tibbs is torn—he’s eager to leave, but wouldn’t mind showing up these prejudiced, ignorant white men.
The film’s most famous scene is the confrontation between Tibbs and Endicott (Larry Gates), a wealthy cotton farmer and a principal murder suspect. Their conversation begins as a calm discussion on orchids, but Endicott quickly shows his racist side when he notes his flowers are “like the Negro…they need care and feeding and cultivating.” Tibbs coolly ignores the insult and persists with probing questions. When Endicott realizes he’s under investigation for murder, he slaps Tibbs across the face. Without hesitation, Tibbs strikes him back. When an enraged Endicott asks Gillespie what he’s going to do about Tibbs’ actions, the police chief replies simply: “I don’t know.”
Seen today, the scene still works as powerful drama. It no doubt had a greater and more significant impact when In the Heat of the Night was originally released. Ironically, Tibbs’ slap wasn’t in the novel nor the original screenplay (in both, Tibbs just walks away). In a February 2009 interview with the American Academy of Achievement, Poitier said he read the script and then told producer Walter Mirisch: “I will insist that I respond to this man (Endicott) precisely as a human being would ordinarily respond to this man. And he pops me, and I'll pop him right back. And I said, if you want me to play it, you will put that in writing. And in writing you will also say that if this picture plays the South, that that scene is never, ever removed.” Mirisch agreed and a classic, landmark scene made its way into a mainstream Hollywood film.
Historical significance aside, the film’s best-played scene has Tibbs and Gillespie relaxing in the latter’s drabby home as a train whistle echoes in the distance. Drinking warm bourbon, Gillespie confesses to Tibbs that the Philly detective is the first person to see the inside of his home. Then, in an unguarded moment, Gillespie opens up about his mundane existence and isolation.
Gillespie: Don’t you get just a little lonely?
Tibbs: No lonelier than you, man.
Gillespie: Oh now, don’t get smart, Black boy. I don’t need it. No pity, thank you. No thank you.
The scene perfectly illustrates the performers’ contrasting acting styles (which is one reason why they work so well together). Steiger dramatically transforms from a sad sack looking off into a corner of room into a proud man who is offended that Tibbs would empathize with him. Poitier, meanwhile, says very little, slumping in his chair to convey exhaustion and leaning forward attentively to show interest in Gillespie.
Thanks in part to Stirling Silliphant’s excellent dialogue, In the Heat of the Night provides an ideal showcase for its two leads. Steiger, who had a tendency to overact in later movies, remains in total control here. Gillespie’s sloppy appearance, yellow-tinted sunglasses, and constant gum-chewing makes him look like a typical redneck Southern sheriff—but Steiger skillfully avoids playing the stereotype. Gillespie comes across as wily, independent, proud, prejudiced, and lonely. The performance earned Steiger a well-deserved Best Actor Oscar.
Poitier matches him scene for scene as the intelligent, proud, equally prejudiced Tibbs. He skillfully underplays the Philadelphia detective, so that when Tibbs strikes Endicott or flashes his anger toward Gillespie, those scenes catch fire. Amazingly, Poitier was not Oscar nominated, perhaps because his votes were split among three memorable 1967 performances: In the Heat of the Night, Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, and To Sir, With Love.
Strip away its atmospheric setting and riveting characters and In the Heat of the Night is just an average mystery. But, in this case, the plot is just a means to the ends. The film is foremost a character study of two strong-willed men (played by two actors at the peak of their careers). Secondly, it’s a portrait of Southern life in the late 1960s. Some of it may be exaggerated, but overall, screenwriter Silliphant and director Norman Jewison skillfully capture a time and a place—making the viewer feel like they’ve just experienced a visit to Sparta in the 1960s. That’s what makes the confrontation between Tibbs and Endicott so powerful.
In the Heat of the Night also spawned one of the most famous lines of dialogue in movie history (the American Film Institute ranked it #16…it should have been higher). When Tibbs’ investigative skills expose a flaw in Gillespie’s initial theory about the crime, the following exchange take place:
Gillespie: Well, you're pretty sure of yourself, ain't you, Virgil? Virgil, that's a funny name for a nigger boy to come from Philadelphia. What do they call you up there?
Tibbs: They call me Mister Tibbs!
And that’s exactly what they called Virgil in two sequels in which Poitier reprised the role: They Call Me MISTER Tibbs (1970) and The Organization (1971). Sadly, neither film is very good. They transform Tibbs into a family man working in a big city—making him just another detective working the streets in a 1970s urban crime film.
In 1988, In the Heat of the Night was adapted as a television series starring Carroll O’Connor as Gillespie and Howard Rollins as Tibbs. Set in Sparta again, the show lasted for eight seasons, although Rollins was dropped after 1993 due to legal problems.
The Black History Month Classic Movie Blogathon is presented by the Classic Movie Blog Association (CMBA). Click here to visit the CMBA web site, where you'll find links to other reviews in the blogathon.
Rick, I have not seen The film IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT. After reading your review. This one most definitely belongs in my DVD collection.
ReplyDeleteRiok ,I enjoyed your post. Some of the things that make this film really work you did not mention. Norman Jewison's directing, It's so good you don't really notice it , and Haskell Wexler's cinematography,and Hal Ashby's editing. Also Qunicy Jones score, and it sure doesn't hurt to have Ray Charles singing over the opening credits.
ReplyDeleteRick, great review of a wonderful film. This is Steiger's best performance--you're right about his overacting in later years. Poitier did a great job as Tibbs, too. I liked how he could be cool as a cucumber one minute and enraged the next. I also love that scene in the garden between Tibbs and Endicott. I didn't know about Poitier insisting that it be included in the picture. Very informative review.
ReplyDeletePaul, I agree that the technical credits are impressive all around. I did mention Jewison's directing; it is seamless, as you say, and also captures the era and setting impeccably.
ReplyDeleteOPPS Rick, Yes you did , I should not "speed read " your posts.
ReplyDeleteThis is an excellent review of a very well crafted film. Steiger and Poitier play off each other expertly. The title "In the Heat of the Night" perfectly reflects the confrontations that ensue. I think it was a shame that Poitier was not nominated for any of his 1967 films because "To Sir, With Love" and "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" also featured remarkable performances. I really enjoyed your research and tribute to this classic film. Bravo!
ReplyDeleteA fine write-up of an excellent film. I was amazed to read it was filmed in downstate Illinois, rather than the South. Apparently there were concerns of the cast and crew's safety if they filmed in the South.
ReplyDeleteRick, you've written a seemingly endless number of wonderful reviews, but this one may be your best yet. You do the film justice, and I highly recommend this for anyone who hasn't seen it. I caught it one morning before work, and I had to leave with about 40 minutes remaining. All day at work, I was tapping my foot, anxious to get home and finish the film. It was worth the wait! Thanks for a most excellent write-up!
ReplyDeleteIt's great to read that others enjoy IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT as much as I do. It's the rare film that is historically significant, entertaining, and well-crafted. When it won the Oscar in '67, some critics harped that fellow nominees THE GRADUATE and BONNIE AND CLYDE were better films. Those two are considered classics, too, but I think HEAT holds up nicely beside them.
ReplyDeleteI actually much prefer IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT over those two.
ReplyDeleteI love this movie, and the scenes you've described are some of my favorites.
ReplyDeleteHave you read 'Pictures at a Revolution'? It discusses the making of "In the Heat of the Night" and is an excellent book. I taught a class based on this book last spring and showed this film, and I was pleased that the film remains strong after all these years.
ReplyDeleteClassicfilmboy, thanks for the book recommendation; I will check it out. Sark, I loved your comment, because your experience is evidence of the power of a good movie. Once on a business trip, I was channel surfing in my hotel room just before bed. I caught the opening of A PATCH OF BLUE...and I was hooked. Two hours later...in the wee hours of the following day...I turned off the TV, having experienced a thoroughly engrossing movie.
ReplyDelete